The recent surge in the US stock market has caught the attention of analysts and investors alike, as the market rebounds from a previous downturnParticularly noteworthy is the performance of the Nasdaq Index, which is inching closer to its peak levels from 2023. In stark contrast, the A-share market remains subdued, struggling to keep pace with its American counterpart.

This current wave of growth in the US market can be traced back to late October when the stocks experienced a remarkable upswing, rallying approximately 10% over a short span of two weeksA significant factor contributing to this resurgence is the sharp decline in US Treasury yields, leading to heightened expectations of interest rate cuts.

The ratio of the Nasdaq 100 to the Russell 2000—representing technology and small-cap stocks respectively—has reached levels unseen since the aftermath of the dot-com bubble in the year 2000. What stands out from this rally is the performance of a group commonly referred to as the “Magnificent Seven,” which includes Nvidia, Facebook, Tesla, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Apple

Advertisements

Collectively, these stocks have shown astounding growth this year, with Nvidia soaring by 234%, Facebook gaining 176%, and Tesla climbing 97% among others.

This leads to an essential question: Are we witnessing the dawn of a new tech bubble in the US stock market? The "Magnificent Seven" stocks have collectively risen by 71% this year while the remaining 493 stocks in the index have only managed a modest 6% increaseThis stark disparity raises concerns about market imbalances; however, some analysts argue that this scenario should not be equated with the tech bubble of the early 2000s.

Unlike during the internet boom period of the late 1990s, when valuations were astronomically high with little underlying profit, the current market conditions reflect a shift in the industrial structure of the US economyThe tech sector holds a more significant proportion of economic activity today, rendering current high valuations more justified

Advertisements

Back then, internet companies boasted lofty market capitalizations but often lacked tangible profitsIn contrast, the current "Magnificent Seven" is backed by substantial revenue streams and diverse business models.

Even if some level of a bubble exists in today's market, it fundamentally differs from the catastrophic bubble of 2000, as the health of underlying businesses is vastly improvedBubbles are characterized by the divergence between valuation and growth, and in today's context, it's critical to analyze individual companies to determine if they are indeed overvalued.

For instance, Nvidia’s P/E ratio stands at an eye-watering 117, with a market cap of $1.21 trillionComparatively, established firms like Intel and Qualcomm come in significantly lower at $171 billion and $140 billion respectivelyThis disparity may suggest some bubble-like behavior, especially when questioning the sustainability of Nvidia's future growth in the face of increasing competition, such as Huawei's Ascend chips

Advertisements

Furthermore, while AI technology has become a strong driver, it begs to ask whether the demand for AI chips can eclipse that for smartphones.

Taking a closer look at Apple, its current valuation places it at a P/E of 30, marking it as a large-cap corporation with a market cap of $3 trillionHowever, one must inquire whether Apple’s growth trajectory has hit a plateauThe past few years have seen minimal profit growth from Apple, with the recent iPhone 15 launch generating little in terms of innovations and wearables failing to take off as expectedWith competition from Huawei's Mate 60 re-entering the premium smartphone market, Apple’s ability to command a 30 P/E ratio appears increasingly tenuous.

Apple has effectively captured the available profits within its industry, and with mounting competition, the question remains: Where will new avenues for growth emerge? The phenomenon of larger firms facing growth challenges is not unique, as seen in notable cases of industry giants like Nokia and IBM that once dominated their fields.

Apple symbolizes the mobile internet era, just as Nokia was emblematic of the feature phone age

• Mercedes-Benz: Embracing a New Era
• Intel Shares Surge 9.5%
• China-U.S. Treasury Yield Differential Holds Steady
• The UK Bond Market May Continue to Suffer
• How High Will U.S. Treasury Yields Soar?

The ceiling has now been reached for mobile internet penetration, similar to the saturation seen with China's urbanization rates; when such caps are hit, the potential for risk escalatesAs competition heats up, particularly from China in the smart electric vehicle (EV) sector, Tesla's market presence becomes increasingly vulnerableDespite Tesla's commendable sales growth, competition from established automakers and advancing Chinese manufacturers loom largeThe valuation sported by Tesla, at around 80 P/E, includes speculative expectations based on future endeavors like humanoid robots, which remain largely conceptual at this stage.

Then there’s Amazon, which has revolutionized e-commerceOnce viewed as an invincible entity, a deeper look reveals that the profitability of such enterprises is hardly guaranteed in an intensely competitive environment, especially amidst the challenges faced by its peers like Taobao and JD.com

Amazon’s market capitalization at $1.5 trillion, combined with a P/E ratio of 71, raises further questions about its sustainable growth.

Facebook, another heavyweight in the tech landscape, operates primarily through its advertising model, currently cherishing a market cap of $850 billion and a P/E ratio of 30. When juxtaposed with its peers, Facebook appears slightly more stable but still not exactly a bargain.

Finally, Microsoft, boasting a market cap of $2.7 trillion and a P/E of approximately 36, looks deceptively cheap compared to other sectors, particularly from an A-share viewpointHowever, the company faces similar conundrums as its counterparts; with immense size comes the challenge of sustaining growthMany investors remain oblivious to the fact that once firms achieve a certain scale, their growth trajectories become progressively challenging.

This trend parallels the property sector, which relied heavily on the expanding penetration of smartphones and the internet

Much like urbanization reached a saturation point in China, the growth of mobile internet is nearing a similar endAs this threshold is reached, any associated growth will inevitably face headwinds.

Moreover, there’s a collective underestimation by investors regarding the implications of permanently higher interest rates in the United StatesThe previously low-interest environment spanning the last decade is increasingly deemed a historical anomalyWhen assessing borrowing costs, we must delve into the broader context where average rates have typically hovered around 5% over the past half-century.

In light of these ongoing developments, it’s imperative to reassess valuations, particularly as rising interest rates increase capital costsThe broader consensus reveals that while the US stock market may seem overvalued with some indicative bubble-like characteristics, it lacks the extreme inflationary pressures witnessed during the peak of the dot-com bubble.

In conclusion, discerning the nuances of today’s stock market, particularly with regards to technology-focused stocks, requires not only an understanding of individual company circumstances but also recognizing the significant shifts in the economic landscape